BBC Sport has detailed the Football Association’s decision to fine Chelsea F.C. £325,000 and West Ham United F.C. £300,000 following a “mass confrontation” during their Premier League clash in January. It was an explosive finale to a dramatic contest at Stamford Bridge, one that Chelsea ultimately won 3-2 after trailing 2-0.
The Football Association charged both clubs with failing to control their players in the 95th minute, when tensions boiled over. As the FA statement read, “It was alleged that Chelsea FC failed to ensure its players didn’t behave in an improper and/or provocative way around the 95th minute.
“It was also alleged that West Ham United FC failed to ensure its players didn’t behave in an improper and/or provocative and/or violent way at this time.
“Both clubs subsequently admitted the charges against them.”
Those admissions shaped the outcome, yet the regulatory commission was unequivocal in its assessment of what unfolded.
Photo: IMAGO
FA Rule E20.1 Under Spotlight
Central to the punishment was FA Rule E20.1. The rule states that there should be no behaviour that is “improper, offensive, violent, threatening, abusive, indecent, insulting or provocative”.
In imposing the fines, the commission took into account previous breaches by both clubs. This was not treated as an isolated lapse. Instead, it formed part of a pattern that governing bodies are increasingly determined to curb.
The written reasons pulled few punches. “This was a serious incident” involving a number of Chelsea’s players. The commission added, “It was not accepted that Mr Cucurella was wholly without fault. He was aware of his actions after conceding the corner kick and returning to his feet.
“He sought to invite a reaction from Mr Traore. That is not to justify Mr Traore’s disproportionate reaction from which the mass confrontation ensued.”
Such language underlines how finely balanced these flashpoints can be. A gesture, a shove, a…
..
